Article 21

Right to privacy 

Case law 

Saretha v vengadasubbaiah

The appellant filed a petition in the Andhra high court against the order of the lower courts for cohabitation 

The defendant filed RCR ( restitution of conjugal rights)

Using sec.9 of Hindu marriage act

The appellant  being a famous actor was not interested in procreation of children and cohabitation.

The body which is her personal body, she has the privacy to use her body for procreation of children and in this case rcr is a violation of right to privacy under article 21.

Judgement 

The case was in favour of Sareetha.


Telephone tapping -it is an infringement of right to privacy

The tapping of telephones of citizens is a violation of article 21 and should not be tapped unless it creates any public disorder.

The tapping of telephone should be done with the permission of home Secretary and the copies of records should be deleted as soon as the citizen proves that the conversation does not bring any harm to the society.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Administration of justice

Indian Christian succession

Procedural law and substantive law