Article 21
Case law
Saretha v vengadasubbaiah
The appellant filed a petition in the Andhra high court against the order of the lower courts for cohabitation
The defendant filed RCR ( restitution of conjugal rights)
Using sec.9 of Hindu marriage act
The appellant being a famous actor was not interested in procreation of children and cohabitation.
The body which is her personal body, she has the privacy to use her body for procreation of children and in this case rcr is a violation of right to privacy under article 21.
Judgement
The case was in favour of Sareetha.
Telephone tapping -it is an infringement of right to privacy
The tapping of telephones of citizens is a violation of article 21 and should not be tapped unless it creates any public disorder.
The tapping of telephone should be done with the permission of home Secretary and the copies of records should be deleted as soon as the citizen proves that the conversation does not bring any harm to the society.
Comments
Post a Comment