Skip to main content

Hindu minority and Guardianship act 1956

The act deals with the guardian of the minor

Guardian-

The person who takes care of the minor 

1. Natural guardian

2. Guardian appointed by the will of father or mother

3. Appointed by court

Natural guardian

Natural guardian of the minor boy or unmarried girl would be father then mother

In case of child under 5 years mother would be natural guardian

Testamentary guardian

The father by will may appoint a guardian when mother is alive

But the mother would be the guardian she can appoint a guardian when she dies the fathers appointed guardian would revive.

De facto guardian 

When there is no one to take care relations may take care of the minor but it is abolished under the act.

Powers of the guardian

The guardian can alienate the property any sale, transfer , mortgage with the approval of courts

Lease can be made for 5 years and 1 year after the minor attaining majority 

The agreement made in case of minor is void able and specific enforcement can’t be made unless it is proved that it is made for necessity.

Power do karta to alienate property

Karta being the manager of coparcenary property , even though the minor has a undivided share can alienate without the permission of the court 

Rule in hanuman Prasad case

The widowed mother did  a usfructury mortgage on the minors property 

The minor sued to set aside the mortgage 

1.the council applied the principles that the mortgage would be valid

If it is for necessity

the lender should make necessities before giving the loan

Otherwise it would be voidable.

Parents conversion

Certain cases where the Christian mother converted to islam 

Minor daughter was ready to convert to Islam

But a relation of her father filed a petition for removal of guardianship 

The minor because of age could not take a decision and was decided to be a under Christian guardian appointed by court.

Illegitimate children and mothers remarriage 

Mother would be guardian 

Case law 

V.Meenapushpa v Ananthan Jayakumar 

The custody of the children were handed over to the grand parents as they were willing and intelligent enough to decide and not with the father.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Right to passage

The international law does not clearly define the control of the right to passage. Even though if defined who could exercise control over the passsge is the question  The strait of Hormuz now blocked by the country of iran is widely condemned by the United Nations What could be reason is it really war or anything else for the condemning nations  First was this opposed by the Russia china and India? What could be the reasons whether is this the only war that affects the lives of people or the lives of people was immaterial in earlier and on going wars . Was Iran doing the right thing by blocking the strait of hormuz , any nations who s threatened could defend themselves but is the Real defence mechanism  What is the strait jacket formula in war . Ukraine and Russia was into war for the last two years was anyone worried other than the two  anyhow the only affected would the civilians in the war and not the heads so many battered displaced does it even matter ? Put your...

Maintenance for wife /children

The question here would be whether the wife is entitled to maintenance even after divorce ? Is she entitled to maintenance after mutual consent? Does the children born out of the wedlock is entitled to maintenance? These questions are answered here This is applicable to all women irrespective of religion. The wife can claim maintenance even after divorce until she is remarried. The children is entitled to maintenance . More check crpc 125. For further details consultant your advocate .

Witness

 Who are competent witness 1 any body can be a witness if they can understand the question put forward and answer the question I respect of age and if he a lunatic he is not prevented from giving witness  2. Accomplice  The person who would be the co accused whom might I in turn change as approver  Is the witness a credit worthy witness or he has given the witness due to coersion  The prosecution must prove that based on independent and material evidence rather the conviction merely on accomplice witness  The question would be in case of rape there is no accomplice   The victim is the witness why not unless and until if the victim is it married and of tender age. Post your thought and comments .